A student looks outside the window daydreaming while other students are actively engaged in the learning happening in the classroom. Another becomes upset when an adult stands too close. A third puts their head down during a difficult reading task.

These behaviors can seem like inattention, defiance, or avoidance. They may also reflect a student’s response to trauma.

In “Trauma-Informed Care: A Guide for Speech-Language Pathologists in the Schools,” Julia J. Yi, PhD, CCC-SLP, explains how speech-language pathologists can recognize these responses and create safer conditions for communication and learning. Yi is an assistant professor in the Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders in the School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences at Mass General Brigham University.  

Trauma Can Affect Language and Learning

Childhood trauma can result from abuse, neglect, family separation, violence, illness, housing instability, racism, natural disasters, or unsafe environments. These experiences can affect how children relate to adults, regulate emotions, learn, and communicate.

Research reviewed in the article links trauma exposure with challenges in receptive, expressive, and pragmatic language. These include difficulty with language skills such as grammar, narrative skills, reading, writing, and social communication. One cited study found that children who experienced neglect were 10 times more likely to have pragmatic language difficulties than peers without that history, 44 percent compared with 4.2 percent (Di Sante et al., 2019).

These findings matter because language disorders can affect classroom participation, relationships, and academic progress. They also show why school-based clinicians need to consider the whole student, including the environments and experiences that shape communication.

Looking Beyond a Student’s Behavior

Trauma can activate fight, flight, or freeze responses. A student may become aggressive, try to leave, shut down, scan the room for danger, or appear disconnected from the activity.

Trauma-informed care helps clinicians interpret these behaviors within a broader context. Instead of asking only why a student refuses to participate, a speech-language pathologist considers what may help the student feel safe enough to engage.

This approach does not require the clinician to diagnose or treat trauma. That work belongs to qualified mental health professionals. The SLP adapts their services to provide a safe environment, reduce distress, support regulation, and improve access to assessment and intervention, ultimately providing a therapeutic environment in which their communication needs could be supported.

Six Trauma-Informed Practices for Speech-Language Pathologists

Yi identifies six practical approaches that clinicians can use in school settings.

1. Recognize trauma responses

Speech-language pathologists learn to identify possible signs of hypervigilance, dysregulation, or dissociation. A calm voice, slower pace, breathing support, or a brief pause may help a student return to the present activity.

2. Create a safe environment

Predictability can reduce uncertainty. Clinicians can establish consistent routines, explain schedule changes in advance, limit unnecessary sensory stimulation, and provide a calm therapy space.

3. Collaborate with the student’s team

Teachers, caregivers, social workers, counselors, psychologists, and other professionals may hold information that helps guide care. Collaboration also allows the team to provide consistent support across settings.

4. Use a strengths-based approach

A strengths-based perspective focuses on resilience, interests, abilities, and effort. It helps clinicians view challenging behavior as communication or coping, rather than as a fixed trait.

5. Gather a comprehensive case history

Educational records, caregiver interviews, attendance patterns, and prior services can help clinicians select appropriate assessments and goals. Yi advises clinicians to avoid asking students to recount personal trauma when another informed adult can provide the necessary background.

6. Include students in choices

Trauma can reduce a person’s sense of control. Offering appropriate choices, such as selecting a book or activity, or co-developing a goal, can support autonomy. Clinicians should adjust the number and type of choices to each student’s needs.

What This Looks Like in Practice

The article’s case examples show how small clinical decisions can change a student’s experience. One SLP moves a hypervigilant child from a group to an individual setting and uses fewer direct questions. Another maintains clear physical boundaries for a student whose proximity to adults can trigger distress.

A third gathers a detailed history before assessing an adolescent’s literacy skills, then gives the student choices during intervention. Each response connects the communication goal with the student’s individual context.

Preparing SLPs to Support the Whole Student

The article also identifies a gap between clinicians’ interest in trauma and their formal preparation. In one survey, 74 percent of SLPs reported working with a child known to have experienced trauma. Yet the field has relatively limited research and training on trauma-informed practice.

This gap creates an important opportunity for speech-language pathology education. Students considering an SLP degree need preparation that connects communication science with clinical judgment, collaboration, cultural responsiveness, and ethical care.

Clinicians also need support. Regular work with students who have trauma histories can contribute to secondary traumatic stress, sometimes called compassion fatigue. Awareness, professional boundaries, supervision, self-care, and access to mental health support can help speech-language pathologists protect their own well-being.

Trauma-informed care does not offer one standard response for every student. It offers a framework for asking better questions, shaping safer environments, and adapting services with care. When speech-language pathologists understand the relationship between trauma, behavior, and language, they can help more students participate, communicate, and learn. 

Citation

Yi, Julia J. “Trauma-Informed Care: A Guide for Speech-Language Pathologists in the Schools.” Language Speech and Hearing Services in Schools, vol. 57, no. 1, 28 June 2025, pp. 1–16, https://doi.org/10.1044/2025_lshss-24-00128.